Do you abhor the wholesale murder of millions of pre-borns by unrestricted (including late-term and partial-birth), taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand? Convenience abortions are the most heinous and immoral approved act in this nation’s history.  Partial-Birth Abortion is nothing short of aggravated murder. 

Do you detest the predation of children by lowering the age of sexual consent?

If so, then consider Utah Lt. Governor Spencer Cox’s veneration of the despicable … thankfully, deceased … U.S. Supreme Court “Justice,” Ruth Bader Ginsburg (referred to in the picture below as “RGB”). Here’s what Cox tweeted:

Except for NOT ever being a “badas,” Cox is certainly trying to be like her. Here’s more from the Cox tweet as he tippytoed through the tulips about Ginsburg:

“Two years ago I had the honor of meeting Justice Ginsburg. She had a brilliant legal mind and was every bit as funny and engaging as advertised.  We obviously disagreed on many legal opinions, but honor her legacy as a trailblazer and dedicated public servant.”

More accurately and persuasively in Ginsburg’s case … “History is replete with brilliant, deranged minds.”

As he has repeatedly demonstrated, “Loosey Goosey” Cox will grasp at anything … even drop some sly inference of a relationship and affinity with the mighty RBG.  Anything to help him “slick” a few more votes from the other side of Utah’s political spectrum.

Supreme Court Defender of Partial-Birth Abortion Dies

by Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) – Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who defended what she argued was a constitutional “right” to partial-birth abortion, passed away on Friday night. She was 87 years old.

In the 2000 case of Stenberg vs. Carhart and the 2007 case of Gonzales vs. Carhart, Ginsburg made clear her view that the U.S. Constitution protected a “right” to abortion (as the court had ruled in the 1973 case of Roe vs. Wade and the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey) and that this right extended to the practice of partial-birth abortion.

The 2000 case of Stenberg vs. Carhart focused on a Nebraska state law that outlawed partial-birth abortions. At the time, there were also 29 other states that banned partial-birth abortions.

The court ruled 5-4 in Stenberg that Nebraska’s partial birth abortion law was unconstitutional. The five-justice majority included Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Chief Justice William Rehnquist dissented as did Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

In his dissenting opinion in Stenberg, Justice Thomas described the partial-birth abortion procedure which the court’s majority declared a constitutional right.

Justice Thomas wrote:

“Although there are variations, it is generally performed as follows: After dilating the cervix, the physician will grab the fetus by its feet and pull the fetal body out of the uterus into the vaginal cavity. At this stage of development, the head is the largest part of the body. Assuming the physician has performed the dilation procedure correctly, the head will be held inside the uterus by the women’s cervix. While the fetus is stuck in this position, dangling partly out of the woman’s body, and just a few inches from a completed birth, the physician uses an instrument such as a pair of scissors to tear or perforate the skull. The physician will then either crush the skull or will use a vacuum to remove the brain and other intracranial contents from the fetal skull, collapse the fetus’ head, and pull the fetus from the uterus.”

In her own opinion, concurring in the court’s decision to throw out the Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion, Justice Ginsburg cited Parenthood vs. Casey and said that the partial-birth abortion ban “violates the Constitution.”

“A state regulation that ‘has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus’ violates the Constitution,” Ginsburg wrote in her Stenberg opinion.

Seven years later, in the case of Gonzales vs. Carhart, the court reviewed a federal ban on partial-birth abortion. This time the court ruled 5-4 in favor of the partial-birth abortion ban. Justice Ginsburg wrote the dissent in which Justices Stevens, Souter and Breyer joined.

In this dissent, Ginsburg argued that it was “irrational” to ban partial-birth abortion.

“In sum,” wrote Ginsburg, “the notion that the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act furthers any legitimate governmental interest is, quite simply, irrational.”

She then argued that the court’s opinion upholding the partial-birth abortion ban was part of an “effort to chip away” at the “right” to abortion.

“The Court’s defense of the statute provides no saving explanation,” wrote Ginsburg. “In candor, the Act, and the Court’s defense of it, cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this court—and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women’s lives.”

From The Business Insider, “Just hours after the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday, Rep. Doug Collins unleashed a harsh attack on her abortion record during her 27-year tenure on the court.  ‘RIP to the more than 30 million innocent babies that have been murdered during the decades that Ruth Bader Ginsburg defended pro-abortion laws,’ Collins tweeted Friday night.”

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg favors decriminalizing pedophilia and child sex traffickingDr. Maria Hsia Chang (aka Dr. Eowyn)

The legal definition of “age of consent” is:

Age of consent refers to the legally defined age at which a person is no longer required to obtain parental consent to get married.  It also refers to the age at which a person is held to have the capacity to voluntarily agree to sexual intercourse.  Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of consent may lead to criminal charges of statutory rape or sexual assault …

Statutory rape is sex between an adult and a minor below the age of consent.  Every state has a statutory rape law in some form. The age of consent varies from state to state, but is generally from 16 – 18 years of age... Consent of the victim and belief that the victim is of the age of consent are usually considered immaterial.

A pedophile is an adult with “sexual fondness for and activity” with children, i.e., minors below the age of consent. Pedophilia is legally defined as sexual child abuse, i.e., any sexual activity with a minor below the age of consent, which includes fondling a child’s genitals, intercourse, incest, rape, sodomy, exhibitionism, and commercial exploitation of children through prostitution or the production of pornographic materials.

Since the age of consent in the United States which varies from state to state is  from 16 to 18, lowering the age of consent to 12 would legalize pedophilia of children age 12 and above.

That is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee and daughter of Russian Jewish immigrants, recommends in a co-authored book that led to sweeping changes made by the federal government in the name of sex equality.

In 1977 when Ginsburg was General Counsel of the ACLU, she co-authored (with Brenda Feigen-Fasteau) Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which was published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in April 1977, for which Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

The 230-page Sex Bias in the U.S. Code identifies hundreds of federal laws alleged to discriminate against women and recommends an avalanche of government and social changes, including:

• Military draft and combat duty for women.
• Legalization of prostitution (see pages 97, 99, 215-216 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code)
• Sex integration of prisons, reformatories, schools and colleges and their activities (including sports), all-girls and all-boys organizations, and fraternities and sororities.
• Changing the names of the Boy Scouts, Girls Scouts and Big Brothers of America to reflect sex integration (see pages 145, 205 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code).
• Elimination of the traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker.
• Comprehensive government child-care.
• Adoption of sex-neutral language, e.g., “artificial” instead of “manmade”; “person, human” instead of “man, woman”; and plural nouns “they” and “them” instead of “singular third person pronouns”. At the same time, however, Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau hypocritically insist that the U.S. Department of Labor retains its “Women’s Bureau”.

On p. 102 of Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, under the sub-heading “Recommendations,” Ginsburg and Feigen-Fasteau recommend a revision of 18 U.S.C. §2032 from “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” to “A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and … the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old“. Below is the pertinent paragraph: 18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old.

Ginsburg (and her co-author) also recommends that the Mann Act be repealed. The Mann Act is a federal law passed in 1910 which makes it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose”.

From Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, pp. 98-99:

The Mann Act … poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates …. It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens….’

In other words, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her way, sexual abuse of children 12-years or older would not be a crime, nor would child sex trafficking.
Ginsburg will be 84 next month. May President Trump be given the opportunity to nominate her replacement on the Supreme Court.

H/t Executive Director of Eagle Forum Susan Hirschmann’s Testimony Re. Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Senate Judiciary Committee, July 23, 1993.

Scrubbing Ginsberg’s Past

Revisionist apologists are frantically working overtime to clean up the Ginsburg record.  Links to “Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights” were broken in the above Chang document and elsewhere on the internet.  We have captured, archived and relinked the ~240-page document throughout and posted it below should the reader want to verify Chang’s allegations.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15I-vg4F7GGLObJgrLp9CAdA0L2TsllkT/preview

Cox Reflects Utah’s Sick Culture

“Quarantine Queen” Spencer Cox doesn’t exist in a vacuum.  He is the product of an environment where pedophiles have often been protected and as a result, they have proliferated.

We cite for example our posting about the scandalous sexual abuse of minors by members of the clergy found here in “Child Abuse … “But whoever … drowned … depth of the Sea,” and also our oft’ repeated exposé below.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MGg-ktoICwxRCQCxPhSHftQubX16a3OZ/preview

This article is republished with permission from our friend Wayne L. Wickizer – MSAJ