Stonewalling on Clinton Emails Continues Under Trump
Stonewalling on Clinton Emails Continues Under Trump, Watchdog Says
Kevin Mooney / @KevinMooneyDC / February 10, 2019 / This article is republished with permission from our friends at The Daily Signal
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ultimately may be ordered to speak to Judicial Watch lawyers. Pictured: Clinton waits to speak Jan. 7 during an event to promote fewer restrictions on abortion held at Barnard College in New York City. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Federal bureaucrats, defying President Donald Trump, are resisting requests for information about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account while secretary of state and how that may have compromised national security, the head of a legal watchdog group told The Daily Signal in an interview.
Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said Obama administration
officials originally declined to assess the extent to which Clinton’s
email practices damaged national security.
But later, Fitton said, “President Trump’s appointees got in the way of us doing it.”
U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled Jan. 17 that Judicial Watch could begin the process of discovery in the
Clinton email case. That means former Obama administration officials
and Clinton aides must respond to questions from the organization under
oath and in writing.
“Obviously, Mrs. Clinton’s conduct is an issue here, but we are also
talking about the conduct of the Justice Department and the State
Department,” Fitton said in the Jan. 31 phone interview with The Daily
Signal, adding:
The email scandal is not just a Hillary Clinton scandal. It’s a State Department scandal and it’s a Justice Department scandal. There’s a lot of powerful agencies and deep state interests who are implicated in the Hillary Clinton email scandal. That’s why they are protecting her.
Obama administration officials who will be deposed under oath as a
result of Lamberth’s order include Susan Rice, the former national
security adviser who also served as ambassador to the United Nations;
Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser to Obama; Jacob Sullivan,
Clinton’s former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff; and FBI
official E.W. Priestap, who since 2015 has been assistant director of
the agency’s Counterintelligence Division.
Remarkably, Fitton said, he has found that in some instances the
Trump administration has been less responsive than the Obama
administration to Freedom of Information Act requests pertaining to the
Clinton emails and related questions about the Benghazi incident.
Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died in the attacks on the consulate and a nearby CIA annex.
“The main scandal of the Trump administration isn’t Russia,” Fitton
told The Daily Signal. “It’s the agencies’ continuing defense of Hillary
Clinton’s misconduct, which is obviously contrary to the desires of the
president, so it’s doubly scandalous. With some of these issues, we had
an easier time with the Obama Department of Justice than we have had
with the Trump Justice Department.”
“I think the president is very concerned that he is being ill served by the folks he’s appointing to these agencies, and that what they are doing is contrary to the public interest,” Fitton said.
Answers Sought
While secretary of state under President Barack Obama from Jan. 21,
2009, to Jan. 31, 2013, Clinton used an unsecure, private computer
server to send, receive, and store email that contained “top secret” and
classified information, the FBI determined.
Judicial Watch, a Washington-based nonprofit that says it focuses on
“integrity, transparency, and accountability in government,” first
brought to light Clinton’s routine use of a private email account to
conduct government business.
In 2014, Fitton’s organization filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act against the Obama administration, seeking information and
correspondence pertaining to the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack on the
U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The suit led to the disclosure of
Clinton’s nongovernment email account in 2015.
Judicial Watch has four months to conduct discovery in response to Lamberth’s order. According to a press release, the group’s lawyers will seek to find out whether:
—Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act by using a nongovernment email system.
—The State Department’s efforts to settle the Clinton case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith.
—The
State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial
Watch’s request for documents under the Freedom of Information Act.
Lamberth will hold a hearing after discovery to determine whether it is necessary for Judicial Watch to depose additional witnesses, including Clinton and Cheryl Mills, her former chief of staff, the watchdog group says.
“I have little doubt that discovery is going to confirm that [the
Freedom of Information Act] was a major issue in terms of the reason for
Clinton’s email system being secret,” Fitton said, adding of Lamberth’s
order:
The ruling for discovery shows we are in the middle of the Clinton email scandal and not the end of it. The goal is to get the information the court wants to know about and to determine whether or not her [email] system was set up to evade FOIA, whether or not the court was hoodwinked, and whether or not there was an adequate search for documents.
Benghazi Talking Points
Judicial Watch’s 2014 FOIA request sought copies of “any updates and/or talking points” given to Rice,
then U.N. ambassador, “by the White House or any federal agency
concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on
the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.”
The watchdog also sought all “records or communications concerning,
regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi
attack” given to Rice by the White House or any federal agency.
While appearing on multiple Sunday news programs to discuss the attacks that occurred the previous Tuesday, Rice said the attacks were not premeditated and instead were the result of a
spontaneous protest in response to an “anti-Islamic” video on the
internet.
Clinton had declined to go on the Sunday shows. Judicial Watch has
described the written talking points Rice used as the basis for her
comments as“false.”
“The court, not being naïve, has asked whether or not this case is
about the Benghazi talking points,” Fitton said of Lamberth. “This is
the [FOIA] lawsuit that uncovered the Clinton email scandal. We had
asked for Benghazi talking points documents, and they were in the
Clinton emails.”
“They were giving us the runaround,” Fitton said of Obama State
Department officials. “They knew they had them and didn’t want to turn
them over to us. The court wants to know whether the Benghazi scandal
was a reason for keeping these emails secret from and not subject to
search by the State Department.”
Inhis Jan. 15 order,
Lamberth explained why he rejected the State Department’s objections to
allowing Judicial Watch to depose department officials with knowledge
of the talking points on the Benghazi attacks:
Rice’s talking points and State’s understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points’ development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice’s appearances, could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State’s role in the points’ content and development could shed light on Clinton’s motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State’s reluctance to search her emails.
The Daily Signal asked the press offices at the State Department and
the Justice Department for comment on Lamberth’s discovery order and
Fitton’s characterization that the agencies have resisted discovery in
the Clinton email case. Neither department had responded as of
publication time.
Damage Assessment
Another unanswered question for Judicial Watch dates to a lawsuit it filed in March 2017 against the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence and the State Department. The suit sought to compel both
agencies to conduct a “damage assessment” of how hostile foreign actors
may have exploited Clinton’s unsecure email server.
“A big part of the scandal here is we don’t know how compromising Clinton’s use of private email was to national security, because the federal agencies responsible for securing our classified information have refused to investigate it,” Fitton told The Daily Signal. “They presume that foreign actors got her emails, but they’ve never done the required damage assessment of the leakage of classified information.”
Fitton added:
On top of that, we have additional information suggesting that her emails were being copied in real time to another foreign actor like China. Still, no damage assessment has been done and we sued, and we were opposed. The Obama people didn’t want to do it and President Trump’s appointees got in the way of us doing it.
In a separate but related case, Clinton submitted written answers under oath in response to questions from Judicial Watch about her email system.
In that testimony, Clinton said she used the private email for the “purpose of convenience.”
Utah Standard News depends on the support of readers like you.
Good Journalism requires time, expertise, passion and money. We know you appreciate the coverage here. Please help us to continue as an alternative news website by becoming a subscriber or making a donation. To learn more about our subscription options or make a donation, click here.
To Advertise on UtahStandardNews.com, please contact us at: ed@utahstandardnews.com.
Comments - No Responses to “Stonewalling on Clinton Emails Continues Under Trump”
Sure is empty down here...